Canada's Police State

The RCMP has been squirreling away far too much highly sensitive information about Canadians on secret databases, an audit by Canada's privacy commissioner has concluded.

Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart, who released a report on her findings Wednesday, said more than 60 per cent of the files contained in a database of criminal intelligence information should not have been stored there.

In addition, more than 50 per cent of the files in a database about national security investigations were inappropriate. "These databanks have been crowded with tens of thousands of files that should not have been there," Stoddart said in a written statement.

Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart told reporters in Ottawa on Wednesday that tens of thousands of secret files are inappropriately stored in RCMP databanks. Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart, who released a report on her findings Wednesday, said more than 60 per cent of the files contained in a database of criminal intelligence information should not have been stored there.

In addition, more than 50 per cent of the files in a database about national security investigations were inappropriate. "These databanks have been crowded with tens of thousands of files that should not have been there," Stoddart said in a written statement. "The large number of documents held in these exempt banks when their inclusion was unwarranted is disturbing."

Both of the databanks are called "exempt databanks," meaning they are highly secretive and are supposed to contain only the most sensitive information. RCMP can refuse to confirm or deny the existence of information in an exempt databank when someone asks to see it.

But Stoddart said some people have become the subject of information contained in the banks by simply talking to the wrong person or being in the wrong place at the wrong time.

Man on File for making Hijacking joke

She cited the case of a man on a bus tour who was reported to U.S. customs for joking that maybe he should "hijack" the bus to get even with a chronically tardy tour guide. Some five years later, the incident was still in RCMP exempt files, even though it was clearly a bad joke and not a security threat, Stoddart told reporters at a press conference in Ottawa.

Stoddart, in her written statement, said another file is based on a tipster's police call to report that a man had gone into a rooming house and was involved in drug activity. Police investigated and determined the man had in fact only stopped to have a cigarette outside after dropping his daughter off at school.

Despite police having cleared the man of any wrongdoing, his file still exists seven years later, Stoddart said.

Stoddart said the storing of the information in the databanks could have negative consequences. "Being named in a national security exempt bank file could have a harmful impact, particularly in a post-9/11 environment," she said. "For example, it could potentially affect someone trying to obtain an employment security clearance, or impede an individual's ability to cross the border."

She said that is especially troubling is that Canadians cannot get access to the information about themselves that is stored in the banks. She said only information that could seriously threaten national security, international affairs or criminal investigations should be stored in such a secretive way.

She noted that she found the alarming number of inappropriate files still present even after an RCMP internal review resulted in the purging of more than 45,000 files last fall.

Police call numbers Misleading

The RCMP on Wednesday said they are working closely with Stoddart to improve the force's databanks over the next two years.

But RCMP Chief Supt. Dan Killam said the audit numbers are "a little misleading." While he conceded that more than half the files examined by Stoddart breached RCMP policy, he stressed that only a "single-digit percentage" of those actually broke the privacy law.

"That's not to say that we shouldn't be respecting our own policy as well. Hence, that's why, when this process was going on, we were working closely with her."

New Democrat MP Pat Martin chided the Mounties for their lapses. "People have a right to know if they're on these lists," said Martin, a member of the Commons ethics, information and privacy committee. "It's fundamental in any western [sic] democracy. This is serious stuff. This is secret police stuff. This is no laughing matter whatsoever."

Stoddart announced she would be doing an audit of the RCMP's databanks in 2005 at the Maher Arar inquiry, where the issue of police information sharing was central.

Arar, a Canadian citizen who was born in Syria, was stopped at a New York airport on his way home from a vacation in September 2002. U.S. officials accused him of links to al-Qaeda and deported him to Syria, where he was imprisoned and tortured for months. Arar was found innocent after a costly battle with the Canadian government. Torturing a Canadian is now fashionable with the backing of all the news media and police in Canada.

Will anything be done about it?

Not likely, as Canadians have no way of correcting or even looking at corrupt data held in a police state. The Canadian media would rather report ad nausea about a "pregnant rat", rather than hammer the "rights and freedoms" note.

Spying in the Name of ???

My Opinion

Once again the United States is going to spy on the social networking websites under new "laws". Under these new "laws" any person using certain websites can be prosecuted under the U.S. law and everyone on the planet knows what that means. The United States has displayed it's lawlessness to the world over the past 7 years with hidden accusers, no trial, no charge, no justice, inhuman torture and deporting people to be tortured. This new "law" is not about "child protection", it is about getting their foot in the door without warrant or just cause. At what point did these "law makers" in the United States appoint themselves as the Internet Police? They make these laws so vague, as to appear legal, in a nation that has no justice for its own people and absolutely no regard for International Law.

Their New Spy Law

New York state's Attorney General and legislative leaders present legislation to keep people online safe.On January 29, New York's attorney general and state legislative leaders put forward a bill whose objective is protecting people from sexual predators on the Internet. Facebook, MySpace and Yahoo offered their support.

In a press conference, Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Senate Majority Leader Joseph L. Bruno and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver made known legislation they referred to as "groundbreaking" in what concerns its intended restraints and controls of sexual offenders' activities on the Internet.

"Today I believe we're proposing the most comprehensive, smartest, toughest law in the nation to keep people safe online, especially minors," Cuomo declared.

The Electronic Security and Targeting of Online Predators Act (e-STOP) comes as a response to the extensive activity of the sexual offenders on the Internet, especially through social-networking sites, which involve stalking and abusing people, particularly minors.

e-STOP would make a specific request for convicted sex offenders to register their e-mail addresses, instant message screen names and any other online identifiers with the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. The purpose of this would be the availability of such data to social-networking companies and other online services in order that they will be able to block access to sexual criminals and not allow them on their sites.

Additionally, the bill demands allowing sentencing courts and the state's Parole Board to limit the online activities of those who have used the Internet to indulge in sexual offenses, abused a minor or are expected to relapse into their wrongdoings. The bill would especially interdict the use social-networking sites by numerous sex offenders.

As WashingtonPost informs us, there are currently over 627,000 registered sex criminals in the U.S., about 25,000 of whom are in New York.

State attorneys general gave voice to their concern over online safety, especially of minors who fall victims to sexual offenders on social-networking sites, which are very popular with youth.

It wasn’t seldom that the attorneys general have brought critics to Facebook, MySpace and other sites for, in their opinion, not becoming more involved in protecting minors, but the two parties have lately appeared to reach common ground and have come up with several mutual security initiatives, partnerships and accords.

The need for such an e-STOP bill is quite imperious in that it can help social-networking companies protect their sites and users better.

MySpace Chief Security Officer Hemanshu Nigam had the same opinion and stated that laws must match the times and technology. "We hope [e-STOP] becomes a model for other states to follow," he added.

In Cuomo’s view, preferably, legislation like e-STOP would be broadly endorsed in U.S. states and also at the federal level.